Subject: Fwd: Your Complaint ID: 60920 has been receivedSharonAndersonvsCitySt.PAUL,DSI,excessiveInspectionsfraud,libelNOCOMPLAINTS
SUN 1DEC2019
ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON,MURDER OF 2ND HUSBAND,
AFFIANT SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON FOREVER MUST EXPOSE THE PONZI TAXING,FEES,ASSESSMENTS PLUS 4.5% INTEREST OF CITY ST.PAUL,MN
CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF CONSENT AGENDA;S EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS ,SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS, TO FORCE THE PUBLIC TO MARCIA MORMOND
,TO TAX COURT WHICH RAISED FILING FEES.
SHARONS NUMEROUS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS VS CITY ST.PAUL,MN WITH LEGAL NOTICE FOR DECADES TO COUNTY ATTORNEY JOHN.CHOI ETAL.
TO THE ABOVE NAMED COMMERCE COMMISSIONER STEVE KELLEY , REVENUE CYNTHIA BAURLEY ET AL
Min
Min
5 Questions with Steve Kelley, New Minnesota Commerce Commissioner | Humphrey School of Public Affairs
Contact Us | Minnesota Department of Revenuenesota_62.pdf
Contact Us | Minnesota Department of Revenuenesota_62.pdf
In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda thurs,July5,2007 Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12 th ,2007 public hearing Aug.15 th ,07 (GS3041156) Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A Notice to remove from Agenda refer To City or County Attorneys Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707AJ0708A:Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053 VA Widow Candidate Ward (2) Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com ,Attorney Pro Se: Private Attorney General Decedant http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com , http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
all others similarily situated Quitam Whistleblower-Fidicuary Watchdog Victim Relator vs. St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman,DSI and Bob Kessler,Joel Essling and 168 employees, union Supervisory, John Choi, all agents,city attorneys,assigns, in their personal and official capacities, executive branch Kathy Lantry as President of the City Council,enbanc Thune,Bostrom,Harris,Benanav,Montgomery,helgen,her agents,assigns specifically shari moore, Marcia moermond,enbanc in the legislative branch in their personal,official capacities, sued individually, severally, John Do
Doing what I can No way will I go into the Court Arena. No Statute of Limitations on Fraud or Murder. Lillehaug should have addressed this when he was Asst US Attorney 2002 up to including
Dirty Deals by City St.Paul,MN,Attorneys David Lillhaug,Sara Grewing re USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher. Case Fixing Quo Warranto.
Lillhaug was made Supreme Court Justice and Sara Grewing was made 2nd Judicial Court Judge.
Sharons QuiTam_RICO62cv10-112_Manatron
Sharons QuiTam_RICO62cv10-112_Manatron
2009
COUNT I Deceptive Trade 22pgs 1991-2002
COUNT II THEFT BY SWINDLE BY CITY ST.PAUL,MN 2006 to 2019 Theft of Water,Cars,Trailer even Porta Potty without Valid Complaints.
Judicial Corruption _SharonScarrellaAnderson_Lawless America | Sharon4anderson's Weblog
Judicial Corruption _SharonScarrellaAnderson_Lawless America | Sharon4anderson's Weblog
Pictures March 23, 2006:to2019
Best regards from,Sharon***LETTER TO CITY ATTORNEY 4/17/2006 and 4/18/2006 RE: Appeal 4/18/2006, presumed continued Fax: 4/17/2006 | Fax: 4/18/2006
|
COUNT III STEINHAUSHER QUO WARRANTO 2012Case Fixing Terminated 2017.
The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice.
Black Michael Davis, Federal Judge Terminated RICO, Jury D
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Courtemands 2017
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Courtemands 2017
Frank Steinhauser ran out of Money to pursue Equal Justice,
| Wednesday, July 19, 2017 | ||
| 360 | JUDGMENT(las) | |
| Att: 1 | ||
| Tuesday, July 18, 2017 | ||
| 359 | ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/17. (KMW) | |
| Wednesday, July 12, 2017 | ||
| 358 | NOTICE by St Paul, City of Non-Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Kappelman, Ben) | |
| 357 | MOTION to Dismiss/General UNOPPOSED filed by Kelly G Brisson, Mark E Meysembourg, Frank J Steinhauser, III.(Shoemaker, John) | |
| Att: 1 | ||
Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
COUNT IV EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS 4.5%interest AntiTrust TO HARASS,BULLY,STEAL PRIVATE PROPERTYS
 | 3229224100053 | SHARON LEE ANDERSON | 697 SURREY AVE | ST PAUL |
Payable Year Estimated Market Value Green Acres Value Plat Deferment This Old House Exclusion Disabled Vets Value Exclusion Homestead Market Value Exclusion Taxable Market Value Property Classification 2019 $57,500 0 0 0 11,500 $46,000 Frac. Dis Res Hstd Frac. Res Non-Hstd 2020 $75,700 0 0 0 15,100 $60,600 Frac. Dis Res Hstd Frac. Res Non-Hstd
2019 Payable2018 Payable2017 Payable2016 Payable
Estimated Market Value$57,500$51,000$43,700$44,700
Taxable Market Value$46,000$40,800$35,000$35,800
Net Tax Amount$629.72$536.14$447.46$473.92+Special Assessments$1,230.28$991.86$308.54$298.08=Total Taxes$1,860.00$1,528.00$756.00$772.00+Penalty$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00+Interest$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00+Fees$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00-Amount Paid$1,860.00$1,528.00$756.00$772.00=Outstanding Balance$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
Estimated Market Value$57,500$51,000$43,700$44,700
Taxable Market Value$46,000$40,800$35,000$35,800
Net Tax Amount$629.72$536.14$447.46$473.92+Special Assessments$1,230.28$991.86$308.54$298.08=Total Taxes$1,860.00$1,528.00$756.00$772.00+Penalty$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00+Interest$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00+Fees$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00-Amount Paid$1,860.00$1,528.00$756.00$772.00=Outstanding Balance$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
Special Assessments
Note: + sign indicates a multiple year assessment. Click on the + to view additional years.
City of Saint Paul
Assessments
Assessments
| Property Address: | 697 SURREY AVE Select a different property |
| Property ID: | 32-29-22-41-0053 |
| File # | Date | Name | District | Opinion | Comment | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min 19-47 | 11/18/2019 8:11 PM | Affiant SharonScarrellaAnderson | Against |
Councils refusal to read the entire records is Bizzare http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com
Councils Violation fidicuary Trust is Criminal Intent also http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com
City shutting down Reason,Due Process testimony of Peter Butler, Eric Lien, Property Taxes on the Public 37 % is Cruel,
|
| Meeting Name: | City Council | Agenda status: | Final |
| Meeting date/time: | 12/4/2019 3:30 PM | Minutes status: | Draft |
| Meeting location: | Council Chambers - 3rd Floor Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m. The HRA will convene during the 5:30 portion of the meeting. The Final Hearing on the proposed 2020 Budget and Tax Levy, aka Truth in Taxation hearing, will be held at or after 6:00 p.m. | ||
| Published agenda: |  Agenda | Published minutes: | Not available |
| Meeting video: |
| Attachments: |
|
19 RES
19-2045
Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or
Abatement services billed during July 23 to August 21, 2019, and setting
date of Legislative Hearing for January 7, 2020 and City Council public
hearing for February 19, 2020 to consider and levy the assessments
against individual properties. (File No. J2005E, Assessment No. 208304)
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Report of Completion J2005E
Assessment Roll J2005E
Attachments:
20 RES
19-2046
19-2045
Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or
Abatement services billed during July 23 to August 21, 2019, and setting
date of Legislative Hearing for January 7, 2020 and City Council public
hearing for February 19, 2020 to consider and levy the assessments
against individual properties. (File No. J2005E, Assessment No. 208304)
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Report of Completion J2005E
Assessment Roll J2005E
Attachments:
20 RES
19-2046
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME;
Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
From: donotreply@sircon.com
Reply-to: no-reply@vertafore.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 12/1/2019 5:00:06 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: Your Complaint ID: 60920 has been received
Reply-to: no-reply@vertafore.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 12/1/2019 5:00:06 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: Your Complaint ID: 60920 has been received
Thank you for using the Minnesota Department of Commerce Online Complaint Portal. This email will acknowledge receipt of your complaint. As part of its review, the Department will contact the other party(ies) in this matter and provide them sufficient time to respond. Please allow at least 60 days to process your complaint.
Once the Department has completed its review of your complaint, it will send you an explanation of its determination.
If you have additional information or documentation, please attach it to your complaint in the Online Complaint Portal under the Actions tab/Documents. If you have further questions, you can attach your questions under the Actions tab/Comments in the Online Complaint Portal.
Both your willingness to bring this matter to our attention and your patience during the investigation is appreciated.
Please do not reply to this auto-generated email.
