TRUTH,JUSTICE,LIBERTY FOR ALL

TRUTH,JUSTICE,LIBERTY FOR ALL
TREASON WILL NOT BE TOLERATED BY THE STATE & FEDERAL COURTS-COMPLICITY

SharonsVideo Bar

Loading...

Sunday, August 13, 2017

SharonLearnedinECFCandidateSt.PaulMayor2017Chamber

                  Best of Luck to All Sharons Electronic Answers to St. Paul Chamber
                     ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON AT 1058 SUMMIT AVE ST. PAUL,MN     http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com/2012/04/sharonmustexposecourtcommittments.html

                     REPRISALS STARTED WHEN SHARON SCARRELLA SUED MIDWEST FED SL  
  • 536 F.2d 1207 - Resource.Org

    https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F2/536/536.F2d.1207...
    Rev. Sharon L. SCARRELLA et al., Appellants, v. MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN et al., Appellees. No. 75-1912. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
 
 
                 NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FRAUD OR MURDER
                 Your Lovely Wife Laura re www.lmc.org ie Risk Management for City St. Paul,MN as We are Self Insured.
 
                                   MEMORANDUM
 
 

St. Paul   Hi to St.Paul Candidates  Love u all, All Lives Matter
 
Mayor (St. Paul)
Candidate Name Party Website File Date
Sharon Anderson Nonpartisan www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com 8/1/2017
Melvin Carter Nonpartisan www.melvincarter.org 8/1/2017
Elizabeth A. Dickinson Nonpartisan www.elizabethdickinson.org 8/8/2017
Pat Harris Nonpartisan www.patharrisformayor.com 8/1/2017
Holden Holden Nonpartisan holdenformayor.com 8/7/2017
Dai Thao Nonpartisan www.daithao.org 8/9/2017
Barnabas Joshua Yshua Nonpartisan
8/3/2017
 
 http://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdf
 
 
http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/
www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com
https://plus.google.com/101357611930702934024
http://www.eastmetrovoterguide.com/sharon-anderson.html

NOTICE:  This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521. This E-mail is confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, then delete it.


 

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Becky Thorson MNMagistrate 2015


Before taking the bench Thorson had a national practice in IP litigation.
MINNLAWYER.COM|BY BARBARA L. JONES

Saturday, July 7, 2012

SharonSenate64_Computer Systems MNCourts.gov

Please assist Sharon to Implement Voting pdf format www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.comNEWRecent developments of eCourtMN include a Supreme Court order making eFiling and eService of civil and family cases by attorneys mandatory in Hennepin and Ramsey counties, effective Sept. 1, and nine additional courts being selected as eFiling/eService pilot sites. Visit the updated eCourtMN site, which now includes frequently asked questions and answers, as well as preparation information for attorneys.
Large-scale fraud in the computer systems of the US and Israeli courts to be detailed in an international computer science conferenceComputing experts should assume a special civic duty in protecting the People against abuse by governments in the digital era.[] []

View as PDF: http://www.scribd.com/doc/99442662/
Jerusalem and Los Angeles, July 7 - Two papers, detailing large-scale fraud in the electronic record systems of the courts in the US and in Israel, have been peer-reviewed for publication, and selected for presentation in an international data analytics conference in Europe later this year:


1) "Design and Operation of Information Systems of the US Courts are Linked to Failing Banking Regulation"
Abstract­ The current report is based on data mining of the information systems of the US courts – PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) and CM/ECF (Case Management/Electronic Court Filing), and a case study of landmark litigation under the current financial crisis: Securities and Exchange Commission v Bank of America Corporation (2009-10). The case originated in the unlawful taking of $5.8 billions by banking executives, and concluded with the executives never returning the funds to the stockholders and no individual being held accountable. The case was covered numerous times by major US and world media. Data mining of records of the US courts from coast to coast reveals built-in deficiencies in validity and integrity of the PACER and CM/ECF. The case study documents missing and invalid litigation records, leading to the conclusion that the case as a whole amounts to simulated litigation. A number of corrective measures are outlined, including publicly and legally accountable functional logic verification of PACER and CM/ECF, and correction of the defective signature and authentication procedures now implemented in the systems. Information systems and data mining experts face a unique duty in safeguarding the integrity of the courts, human rights, and civil societies in the digital era.

2) "Integrity, of lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel"
Abstract­ The Human Rights Alert (NGO) submission for the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in Israel, filed in May 2012, is probably a first – being narrowly focused on integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, district courts, and the detainees’ courts of the State of Israel. The underlying research is primarily based on data mining of the online public records of the courts.
Supreme Court: On or about March 2002, integrity of the electronic records was seriously compromised. Around that date, increased irregularity is seen in certification authorities and numerous falsified decision records were discovered. Today, all electronic records are published with no certification at all, “subject to editing and phrasing changes”. False and deliberately misleading certifications of decisions of the Supreme Court, which were recently issued by the office of the Chief Clerk, were also discovered. The Administration of Courts also refused to produce the appointment record of the current Chief Clerk, if any existed.
District Courts: The publicly accessible records were found invalid, primarily for failure to display visible, reliable digital signatures of judges and authentication records by clerks. The State Ombudsman’s Report 60b (2010) details various apparent violations of the law in development and implementation of the system.
Detainees Courts: The insecure, unsigned decisions of the detainees courts, often created long time after the dates of the hearings, could not possibly be considered valid legal records. The detainees ID numbers show suspicious discontinuities and failure to correlate with time of issuance. Media reported the conduct of simulated hearing, and issuance of simulated decision in one of the courts. The Israeli Ministry of Justice refused to answer on Freedom of Information request, pertaining to the names and locations of such courts. The results should raise concerns regarding establishment of ”black hole” prisons and ”field courts”.
Electronic Signature Act (2001): The evidence shows that the Ministry of Justice of the State of Israel has deliberately undermined the implementation and enforcement of the Act over the past decade, and with it, the integrity of legal and financial records of the State of Israel. The Ministry of Justice also refused to produce the appointment record of the current Registrar of Certifying Authorities, if any existed.
The findings hold serious implications relative to local socio-economic trends, banking regulation, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The findings should also require reassessment of any faith and credit, which may be given to legal public records originating in the courts of the State of Israel by other nations, including, but not limited to those, who are parties to the Hague Convention (1961).
The Human Rights Alert submission recommends:
1. The electronic records systems of the courts should be examined, repaired, and validated by Israeli computing and legal experts, under accountability to the legislature.
2. A Truth and Reconciliation Commission should be established relative to conduct of members of the judiciary and the legal profession, who were involved in undermining the integrity of the systems;
3. No court of any nation should be permitted to develop and implement its own electronic record systems.
The two cases are inter-related. The systems, implemented over the past decade in the State of Israel, mimic key features of the fraudulent computer systems, which were implemented in the state and federal courts in the United States a couple of decades earlier. Moreover, as detailed by the Israeli State Ombudsman's report, two US-based corporations, IBM and EDS, were involved in the development and implementation of the new systems of the Israeli courts, a process that entailed various violation of the laws of the State of Israel.

The two papers were authored by Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO). [1] Dr Zernik has previously published and presented his research, regarding systemic fraud in governments' computer systems, in a data mining conference in Europe in 2010 [2,3] and in the 16th World Criminology Congress in 2011, Kobe, Japan, [4,5] among other venues.

The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.” [6]

The 2012 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council of the United Nations is titled, "Integrity, of lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel" is scheduled for review in early 2013. [7]
LINKS:
[1]
12-07-07 Biographical Sketch Joseph Zernik, PhD http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/[2] 10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining as a Civic Duty – Online Public Prisoners’ Registration Systems,
International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining 1: 84-96 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328591/
[3]
10-08-18 Zernik, J: Data Mining of Online Judicial Records of the Networked US Federal Courts,
International Journal on Social Media: Monitoring, Measurement, Mining, 1:69-83 (2010)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38328585/
[4] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Fraud and corruption in the US courts is tightly linked to failing banking regulation and the financial crisis, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351562/
[5] 11-08-01 Zernik, J: Los Angeles Superior Court - widespread corruption and refusal of US government to take action, 16th World Criminology Congress presentation
http://www.scribd.com/doc/61351469/[6] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the
2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
[7]
12-06-04 Human Right Alert's Appendix to Submission; 15th UPR Working Group Session (Jan-Feb 2013) - State of Israel: Integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic record systems of the courts of the State of Israel http://www.scribd.com/doc/82927700/ _______

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
The 2010 submission of Human Rights Alert to the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations was reviewed by the HRC professional staff and incorporated in the official HRC Professional Staff Report with a note referring to “corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California.”
Human Rights Alert online Flag Counter: 140http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ http://inproperinla.wordpress.com/ http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/ Total Reads: 868,060 Followers: 1,547http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alerthttp://www.scribd.com/SeyagLizhuyotHaadam Total Reads: 45,147http://twitter.com/inproperinla http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345 Total Item Views: 664,803+249,012
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examinerhttp://www.facebook.com/joseph.zernik
Facebook Friends: 2,906_____________________________Take away justice, then, and what are governments but great bandit bands?Saint Augustine, Civitas Dei (City of God,4.4)
_____________________________

Friday, July 8, 2011

OnlinePetition_William Windson_JosephZernikPhD

Online petition Launched, calling upon the US Congress and US Attorney General to restore the integrity of the United States Lawless America
[]


Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
[]


courts electronic records.

The safeguard of the integrity of court records was for centuries the foundation of due process and fair hearings. The recent disintegration of electronic records in the United States courts undermines any notion of respect for the Human, Constitutional and Civil Rights of the People of the United States, and loyalty of United States judges and clerks to their Oaths of Office.
The United States Congress and United States Attorney General are called upon to perform their duties!




July 8 – William Windsor of Lawless America and Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), have launched an online petition for restoration of the US Constitution and integrity of the US courts. [[i]]

A call for restoration of the integrity of the US courts and the US Constitution

The petition is addressed to the United States Congress and the United States Attorney General. It follows the filing with the United States Congress and the United States Attorney General of similar requests for restoration of the integrity of the electronic record systems of the United States courts, PACER and CM/ECF: [[ii]]
The safeguard of the integrity of court records was for centuries the foundation of due process and fair hearings. The recent disintegration of electronic records in the United States courts undermines any notion of respect for the Human, Constitutional and Civil Rights of the People of the United States, and loyalty of United States judges and clerks to their Oaths of Office.


The United States Congress and United States Attorney General are called upon to perform their duties!

The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis

As documented in a number of impeachment requests, previously filed with the US Congress, corruption of the US courts is a key cause of the current financial crisis, which is often overlooked.

Corruption of the courts and the US justice system has reached the level of a constitutional crisis, the like of which has not been seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property with no due process of law. [[iii]]

Signatures on the petition are solicited from People worldwide. The petition also offers the opportunity to post comments with the signature.

William Windsor

Lawless America
[]

Joseph Zernik, PhD
Human Rights Alert (NGO)
[]


LINKS
[i] Please sign the petition:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/19/Restore-the-US-Constitution-Integrity-of-the-US-Courts/







Restore the US Constitution - Restore Integrity of the US Courts!

We the undersigned call upon the United States Congress and the United States Attorney General to perform their duties, restore the Constitution of the United States and restore the integrity of the United States courts, through corrective actions pertaining to the invalid electronic record systems of the courts - PACER and CM/ECF.

The US is in the midst of a constitutional crisis

As documented in a number of impeachment requests, previously filed with the US Congress, corruption of the US courts is a key cause of the current financial crisis, which is often overlooked.

Corruption of the courts and the US justice system has reached the level of a constitutional crisis, the like of which has not been seen since the Civil War. The People are deprived of life, liberty, and property with no due process of law.

The electronic record systems of the US courts undermine the rule of law.

The Administrative Office of the US Courts implemented with no public oversight invalid public access (PACER) and case management (CM/ECF) systems in the US courts, which undermine the integrity of US court records, and with it - integrity of the courts themselves.

The systems enable the routine conduct of simulated litigation in cases before the US courts:
· No valid summonses are issued, docketed, or executed;
· Judges appear with no valid assignment orders;
· Attorneys appear, who are not authorized by any party, and
· Minutes, orders, and judgments are published online, which are deemed by the US courts themselves as void.

The key deficiency identified in the systems pertain to:

· Invalid electronic authentication records, which are hidden from public access in apparent violation of First Amendment and Due Process rights, [[iv]] and
· Failure to publish valid Rules of Courts or establish the new court procedure in the law.

Conditions, which now prevail in the US courts, are routinely employed to undermine the rule of law, to benefit financial institutions, large corporations, and government officials, and to effectively deny individuals access to the courts to protect their rights. [v]

Proposed corrective measures

The requests offered specific corrective measure, including:
· Restoring the integrity of the offices of the clerks of the US courts;
· Enactment of federal rules of electronic court records, and
· Ongoing monitoring of the courts%u2019 electronic record systems by the People and computing professionals

The safeguard of the integrity of court records was for centuries the foundation of due process and fair hearings. The recent disintegration of electronic records in the United States courts undermines any notion of respect for the Human, Constitutional and Civil Rights of the People of the United States, and loyalty of United States judges and clerks to their Oaths of Office.
The United States Congress and United States Attorney General are called upon to perform their duties!

[ii] 11-07-08 Request filed with the US Congress to restore the integrity of the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59525905/
11-07-08 Request filed with US Attorney General Eric Holder for Review of Integrity of Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59480718/
[iii] 11-06-14 Corruption of the Courts and Failing Banking Regulation in the United States: Dred Scott redux?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/57707808/
11-06-24 Time Magazine - 4th of July Issue: Does the Constitution Still Matter?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/58665806/
_________

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

USAG_EricHolder_JosephZernik_must investigateECF/CM_










inproperinla‎: Reading 11-05-24 PRESS RELEASE: Federal Election Commission (FEC) is asked to disregard Citizens U… on Scribd #readcast 11-05-24 PRESS RELEASE: Federal Election Commission (FEC) is asked to ...59 minutes ago

twitter.com/inproperinla - Cached
10-02-24 Dr Joseph Zernik Abducted, Robbed at Gun Point, is Denied ...


Feb 25, 2010 ... In a series of complaints filed with Los Angeles County Supervisor Stephanie Maxberry on Tuesday, February 23, 2010, Dr Joseph Zernik, ...
www.scribd.com › Business/LawFinance - Cached




  • IN PRO PER IN LA


    Jun 8, 2011 ... Los Angeles, June 3 "So far I have never seen such a letter," says Joseph Zernik , PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO), "Clerk James Hatten of ...
    inproperinla.blogspot.com/ - Cached - Similar






  • Joseph Zernik DMD PhD



    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Quick View
    Joseph Zernik DMD PhD. 2415 Saint George St, Los Feliz CA 90027 Fax: (801) 998- 0917 Email: jz12345@earthlink.net. Digitally signed by Joseph Zernik ...
    www.ahrc.se/new/contents/.../1551080711NOTICECEASERACK.pdf - Similar

  • Tuesday, June 7, 2011



    Eric Holder, US Attorney General is requested to investigate the integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts by the US Attorney General - draft published for suggestions, comments




    Comments, suggestions are solicited regarding request for investigation of the integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts by the US Attorney General Eric Holder

    The electronic records systems of the courts affected a sea change in court procedures, but were never established by law or by rules of courts. Numerous deficiencies were identified in the systems, which undermine the rights of the People and Banking Regulation. US Attorney General is asked to initiate review and investigation. Unless integrity of the US courts is addressed, civil society and socio-economic development conditions are unlikely to improve.


    Eric Holder,
    US Attorney General

    Los Angeles, June 2 – Joseph Zernik, PhD, and Human Rights Alert (NGO), has published a draft request for review and investigation of the integrity, or lack thereof, of the electronic public access and case management systems of the US courts by the US Attorney General Eric Holder. [[i]] The draft is circulated as a request for comments and suggestions prior to its submission to the US Attorney General.

    The request notes that numerous deficiencies were identified in the electronic record systems of the US courts, to the degree that such systems seriously undermine the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of the people, Banking Regulation, and the Rule of Law.

    The request claims that the systems particularly harm pro se filers, who seek remedy for alleged abuse of their rights in the US courts, [[ii]] and that attempts to seek remedy such conditions through the US courts themselves were unsuccessful. [[iii],[iv]]

    Conditions, which now prevail in the US courts, stand in stark contrast with the laws enacted by the US Congress, presidential directives, and regulations pertaining to the validation and authentication of records systems in the Executive Branch.

    The request notes that thorough review of the records systems would be a lengthy process, and implementation of the necessary corrective measures even longer. However, timely response is requested, at least regarding intent, if any, by the US Attorney General to address the matter.

    The writer, Joseph Zernik, PhD, has gained substantial experience in recent years in analysis of large government and corporate record keeping systems
    The writer has gained substantial experience in analysis of large record keeping systems: [[v]]


    • His opinions in such matters were reviewed and adopted by the United Nations official Staff Report, as part of 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States.

    • His opinions in such matters were supported by law enforcement and computer science experts.

    • Papers he authored on the subject were peer-reviewed and published in an international computer science journal with an Editorial Board listing scholars from six European nations and Canada.

    • His opinions in such matters were selected for presentation in international computer science and criminology conferences.
    The Administrative Office of the US Courts has implemented invalid public access (PACER) and case management (CM/ECF) systems in the US courts, which undermine the integrity of US court records.
    The request detailed numerous deficiencies in the electronic records systems of the US courts. Furthermore, implementation of the electronic records systems amounted to a sea change in court procedures. The US courts failed to publish valid Rules of Courts, to establish the new court procedures, deemed effective by the US Courts following the implementation of the systems.

    The core deficiency of the systems is in enabling the publication of simulated PACER dockets, and simulated court orders and judgments, which the clerks of the US courts refuse to certify. [[vi]]

    Implementation of PACER and CM/ECF effectively established two separate and unequal classes in access to the courts and to court records, thereby allegedly discriminating against pro se filers and the public at large.
    Pro se filers (non-attorneys) are routinely denied access to electronic filing and to court records through implementation of the systems. Therefore, the request claims that the systems undermine their Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights.

    The electronic public access and case management systems of the US Supreme Court undermine the foundation of the Rule of Law.
    The request notes similar deficiencies also in the electronic systems of the US Supreme Court. [[vii]]

    Conditions, which were established through implementation of the electronic records system, undermined the integrity of the US courts in both Human, Constitutional and Civil Rights and Banking Regulation matters.
    The request claims that restoration of integrity of the electronic records systems is essential not only for the protection of rights of the People, but also for restoring the integrity of US Banking Regulation. [[viii], [ix]] It claims that conduct of the courts is a key factor in the current financial crisis, which is often overlooked.
    Unless the issues are addressed, it is unlikely that US Banking Regulation will be restored.

    Therefore, it is claimed that addressing these issues is essential for restoring both civil society and socio-economic development.

    Proposed corrective measures
    The request also proposes corrective measures:


    • Restoring the integrity of the offices of the clerks of the US courts:
    It is claimed that conditions that today prevail in the US courts are similar to those that prevailed in the early 20th century, and that both then and now, such conditions are central cause of the socio-economic crises. The Salary Act (1919), which placed the clerks of the US courts under the authority of the US Attorney General was credited with restoring the integrity of the offices of clerks of the US courts a century ago. [[x]]


    • Enactment of federal rules of electronic court records:
    As part of the transition to electronic administration of government, the US Congress passed the E-Government Act (2002) and the E-Sign Act (2000). The US Department of Homeland Security Presidential Directive-12 (2004) further established policies for validation and authentication of electronic systems and electronic records of the Executive Branch agencies. Standards were accordingly promulgated and applications were implemented. In contrast, the records systems, implemented by the US courts, were not covered by such laws and regulations.

    • The People, and computing professionals in particular, should exercise their civic duties in ongoing monitoring of the integrity of electronic court records:
    The common law right to inspect and to copy judicial records was reaffirmed by the US Supreme Court in Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc (1978) as inherent to the First Amendment. In doing so, the US Supreme Court stated that the right was necessary for the People "to keep a watchful eye on government".
    Once public access to electronic court records is restored, the People must keep a watchful eye on electronic court records. No other measure could substitute for scrutiny of court records by the People in safeguarding the integrity of the courts and Human Rights in the Digital Era.

    The request will be copied to Senator Patrick Leahy, Chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Senator Dianne Feinstein.
    _____
    Joseph Zernik, PhD
    Human Rights Alert (NGO)
    _____
    LINKS:
    [i] 11-06-02 DRAFT Request for US Attorney General Eric Holder's Review of Integrity of Public Access and Case Management Systems of the US Courts
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/56893149/
    [ii] May 30, 2011 PRESS RELEASE: Judge Richard Leon, US District Court, DC - “master of the“ Leave toe to file denied”
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/56612919/
    [iii] The core claims regarding critical deficiencies in PACER and CM/ECF were detailed in the Motion to Intervene under Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al in the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, and the Court was asked to initiate corrective actions, regardless of the Intervention in the individual case as well. The Motion to Intervene was denied, and there is no evidence of the initiation of any corrective actions:
    January 7, 2011 Log Cabin Republicans v USA et al (10-56634) at the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - Motion to Intervene and Concomitantly Filed Papers as published in the online PACER dockets
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/46516034/
    [iv] The core claims regarding deficiencies in PACER and CM/ECF, and also regarding records management in the US Supreme Court were detailed in the Motion to Intervene under Fine v Sheriff in the US Supreme Court. The papers, duly filed in the US Supreme Court were “returned” by unauthorized Supreme Court employee, Court Counsel Danny Bickell:
    April 20, 2010 Motion to Intervene and related papers in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at the US Supreme Court
    i) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) Face pages of five filings by Dr Joseph Zernik with stamps showing receipt by the US Supreme Court
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30304657/
    ii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 1 Amended Motion to Intervene
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161573/
    iii) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 2 Amended Request for Lenience by Pro Se Filer
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30161636/
    iv) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 3 Amended Request for Corrections in US Supreme Court Records
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162109/
    v) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 4 Amended Request for Incorporation by Reference
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/30162144/
    vi) 10-04-20 Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) 5 Amended Appendices
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/34050423/
    [v] 11-05-08 Joseph Zernik,PhD, Biographical Sketch
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/46421113/
    [vi] Simulated Litigation, Simulated Minutes, Orders, Judgments, Dockets are used here in the sense established in the Texas Criminal Code:
    Texas Penal Code
    § 32.48. SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS.
    (a) A person commits an offense if the person recklessly causes to be delivered to another any document that simulates a summons, complaint, judgment, or other court process with the intent to:
    (1) induce payment of a claim from another person; or
    (2) cause another to:
    (A) submit to the putative authority of the document; or
    (B) take any action or refrain from taking any action in response to the document, in compliance with the document, or on the basis of the document.
    (b) Proof that the document was mailed to any person with the intent that it be forwarded to the intended recipient is a sufficient showing that the document was delivered.
    [vii] Regarding the public access and case management systems of the US Supreme Court, see:
    a) 11-05-23 PRESS RELEASE: Citizens United v Federal Election Commission in the US District Court, DC invalid court records in a Simulated Litigation
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/56106686/
    b) 11-05-24 RE Citizens United v Federal Election Commission (FEC) - Request for Policy Statement by FEC s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/56145482/
    c) 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER s
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
    d) 10-07-01 Complaint against US Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell for Alleged Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
    [viii] Regarding the effects of the electronic records systems of the US courts on Banking Regulation, see [I,iii,vii], above.
    [ix] Regarding the effects of the electronic systems of the US courts on Banking Regulation, see also:
    1-02-05 Request No 2 for Impeachment of Judge JED RAKOFF Clerk RUBY KRAJICK, US District Court, Southern District of New York, in Re Conduct of Lindner v Amex (1:10-cv-02228)
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/48244479/
    [x] Messinger, I Scott: Order in The Court - History of Clerks of United States Courts, Federal Judicial Center (2002)
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/34819774/

    Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
    _______

    AllianceMNSharon Anderson