TRUTH,JUSTICE,LIBERTY FOR ALL

TRUTH,JUSTICE,LIBERTY FOR ALL
TREASON WILL NOT BE TOLERATED BY THE STATE & FEDERAL COURTS-COMPLICITY

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Impeachment tensions flare: Matt Gaetz goes after Nadler







7:04NOW PLAYING






Monday, December 2, 2019

Sharon4AndersonVSCitySt.Paul,AllAgencies,PonziTaxingQuoWarrantoSchemes2006-2019

Sent: 12/1/2019 12:02:43 PM Central Standard Time
Subject: Fwd: Your Complaint ID: 60920 has been receivedSharonAndersonvsCitySt.PAUL,DSI,excessiveInspectionsfraud,libelNOCOMPLAINTS

                     SUN 1DEC2019
                            ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMON,MURDER OF 2ND HUSBAND,
                   AFFIANT SHARON SCARRELLA ANDERSON FOREVER MUST EXPOSE THE PONZI TAXING,FEES,ASSESSMENTS PLUS 4.5% INTEREST OF CITY ST.PAUL,MN
                         CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE OF CONSENT AGENDA;S EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS ,SIMULATING LEGAL PROCESS, TO FORCE THE PUBLIC TO MARCIA MORMOND
                       ,TO TAX COURT WHICH RAISED FILING FEES.
                       SHARONS NUMEROUS DEFAULT JUDGMENTS VS CITY ST.PAUL,MN WITH LEGAL NOTICE FOR DECADES TO COUNTY ATTORNEY JOHN.CHOI ETAL.
                             
Anderson+Advocates,http://www.msnusers.com/AndersonAdvocates

TO THE ABOVE NAMED COMMERCE COMMISSIONER STEVE KELLEY , REVENUE CYNTHIA BAURLEY ET AL
Min

In the Saint Paul City Council Agenda thurs,July5,2007 Items 35 Resolution Assessments 07-601“from May17 to June12 th ,2007 public hearing Aug.15 th ,07 (GS3041156) Notice to combine with Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A Notice to remove from Agenda refer To City or County Attorneys Notice of Damages over ½ Million Dollars State of Minnesota, County of Ramsey, City of St. Paul Owner- Taxpayer Co Dist.File#J0707AJ0708A:Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053 VA Widow Candidate Ward (2) Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Scarrella http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com ,Attorney Pro Se: Private Attorney General Decedant http://cpljimanderson.blogspot.com , http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
all others similarily situated Quitam Whistleblower-Fidicuary Watchdog Victim Relator vs. St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman,DSI and Bob Kessler,Joel Essling and 168 employees, union Supervisory, John Choi, all agents,city attorneys,assigns, in their personal and official capacities, executive branch Kathy Lantry as President of the City Council,enbanc Thune,Bostrom,Harris,Benanav,Montgomery,helgen,her agents,assigns specifically shari moore, Marcia moermond,enbanc in the legislative branch in their personal,official capacities, sued individually, severally, John Do


                    sun.1
Sharon4CouncilWard2: Sharons Default Judgments v. City St. PaulDec2019


                       Doing what I can No way will I go into the Court Arena. No Statute of Limitations on Fraud or Murder.  Lillehaug should have addressed this when he was Asst US Attorney 2002 up to including
                     Dirty Deals by City St.Paul,MN,Attorneys David Lillhaug,Sara Grewing re USSC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs. Gallagher. Case Fixing Quo Warranto.
                    Lillhaug was made Supreme Court Justice and Sara Grewing was made 2nd Judicial Court Judge.
Sharons QuiTam_RICO62cv10-112_Manatron
                   2009
                             COUNT I  Deceptive Trade 22pgs 1991-2002






                    COUNT II THEFT BY SWINDLE BY CITY ST.PAUL,MN 2006 to 2019 Theft of Water,Cars,Trailer even Porta Potty without Valid Complaints.
Judicial Corruption _SharonScarrellaAnderson_Lawless America | Sharon4anderson's Weblog

                                    COUNT III STEINHAUSHER QUO WARRANTO 2012Case Fixing Terminated 2017.


The quid pro quo between the Department of Justice and the City of St. Paul, Minnesota, is largely the result of the machinations of one man: Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez. Yet the consequences of his actions will negatively affect not only Fredrick Newell and the lowincome residents of St. Paul who he championed. The effects of this quid pro quo will be felt by future whistleblowers who act courageously, and often at great personal risk, to fight fraud and identify waste on behalf of federal taxpayers. The effects of withdrawing Magner will be felt by the minority tenants in St. Paul who, due to the case’s challenge to the City’s housing code, continue to live with rampant rodent infestations and inadequate plumbing. The effects of sacrificing Newell’s case will cost American taxpayers the opportunity to recover up to $200 million and allow St. Paul’s misdeeds to go unpunished. Far more troubling, however, is the fundamental damage that this quid pro quo has done to the rule of law in the United States and to the reputation of the Department of Justice as a fair and impartial arbiter of justice.

Black Michael DavisFederal Judge Terminated RICO, Jury D
Steinhauser et al v. St Paul, City of et al (0:04-cv-02632), Minnesota District Courtemands 2017
Frank Steinhauser ran out of Money to pursue Equal Justice,
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
360  order Judgment (Clerk's Office Only) Wed 07/19 2:29 PM 
JUDGMENT(las)
  Att: 1  Civil Notice - appeal
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
359  order Order Dismissing Case Wed 07/19 9:02 AM 
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/17. (KMW)
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
358  notice Notice (Other) Wed 07/12 3:54 PM 
NOTICE by St Paul, City of Non-Objection to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss (Kappelman, Ben)
357  motion Dismiss/General Wed 07/12 1:21 PM 
MOTION to Dismiss/General UNOPPOSED filed by Kelly G Brisson, Mark E Meysembourg, Frank J Steinhauser, III.(Shoemaker, John)
  Att: 1  Certificate of Service via ECF


Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
                COUNT IV  EXCESSIVE INSPECTIONS  4.5%interest AntiTrust TO HARASS,BULLY,STEAL PRIVATE PROPERTYS
 3229224100053 SHARON LEE ANDERSON697 SURREY AVEST PAUL
Payable Year Estimated Market Value Green Acres Value Plat Deferment This Old House Exclusion Disabled Vets Value Exclusion Homestead Market Value Exclusion Taxable Market Value Property Classification 2019 $57,500 0 0 0 11,500 $46,000 Frac. Dis Res Hstd Frac. Res Non-Hstd 2020 $75,700 0 0 0 15,100 $60,600 Frac. Dis Res Hstd Frac. Res Non-Hstd
 2019 Payable2018 Payable2017 Payable2016 Payable
Estimated Market Value$57,500$51,000$43,700$44,700
Taxable Market Value$46,000$40,800$35,000$35,800

Net Tax Amount$629.72$536.14$447.46$473.92+Special Assessments$1,230.28$991.86$308.54$298.08=Total Taxes$1,860.00$1,528.00$756.00$772.00+Penalty$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00+Interest$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00+Fees$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00-Amount Paid$1,860.00$1,528.00$756.00$772.00=Outstanding Balance$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00

Special Assessments
Note: + sign indicates a multiple year assessment. Click on the + to view additional years.
 Assess #YearDescriptionInitial
Amount
Installment AmountRemaining
Balance
Deferred 
 R-01199996020192019 RECYCLING$0.00$58.20$0.00No 
  
 T-01180025020192018 SMSP Sweeping and Lighting$0.00$41.44$0.00No 
  
 T-01180080020192018 SSSC / Storm Sewer$0.00$98.06$0.00No 
  
 T-0118830102019T-011883010 EXCESSIVE INSPECTION$0.00$169.98$0.00No 
  
 T-0118830202019T-011883020 EXCESSIVE INSPECTION$0.00$169.74$0.00No 
  
 T-0118830302019T-011883030 Excessive Inspection$0.00$167.72$0.00No 
  
 T-0118830402019T-011883040 Excessive Inspection$0.00$167.28$0.00No 
  
 T-0118830502019T-011883050 Exceissive Inspection$0.00$166.84$0.00No 
  
 T-0118830602019T-011883060 Excessive Inspection$0.00$166.42$0.00No 
  
 T-01199997020192019 SOLID WASTE$0.00$24.60$0.00No 
 

City of Saint Paul
Assessments
Property Address:697 SURREY AVE Select a different property
Property ID:32-29-22-41-0053


To get balance due for LEVIED assessments, enter the date when Real Estate would receive your payment (amounts may include interest). Select the assessments you want to pay by checking the box. If you want to make a partial payment, check the box and enter the amount to the right of the checked box.
This is not your eCheck payment date. It is only for calculating interest.
select
Note: Payments may not be processed after November 18, 2019 because the City must prepare the annual certification of assessments to property taxes. Payments received after that date will be returned.

Levied Assessments (due and payable)
Assessment NumberImprovementInterest RateLevied DateTerm YearsLevied AmountBalance Due
Levied Balance Due:$0.00
Fees and Pending Assessments (Payments are accepted)
Project NumberImprovementPending DateTerm YearsPending Amount
J2003EExcessive Inspection or Abatement Service 05/22/19-06/21/198/1/20191$157.00
J2004EExcessive Inspection or Abatement Service 06/24/19-07/22/199/4/20191$157.00
Pending Balance Due:$314.00
Levied and Pending Balance (as of the date above): $314.00
For Informational Purposes Only: Anticipated Charges
The project information listed below is subject to change and does not necessarily reflect all charges that may be placed on the property. Amounts are estimates only. Payments are NOT accepted until a charge becomes pending.
Project NumberImprovementEstimated Invoice DateEstimated Amount
1956002019 SMSP / Sealcoating Street and/or Alley12/31/2019$194.40
Make Payment via U.S. Mail or in person
CITY OF ST PAUL - ASSESSMENTS
700 CITY HALL
15 WEST KELLOGG BOULEVARD
ST PAUL, MN 55102-1658
Questions? Call Assessments
at (651) 266-8858
File #Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
Min 19-4711/18/2019 8:11 PMAffiant SharonScarrellaAnderson Against
Councils refusal to read the entire records is Bizzare http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com
Councils Violation fidicuary Trust is Criminal Intent also http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com
City shutting down Reason,Due Process testimony of Peter Butler, Eric Lien, Property Taxes on the Public 37 % is Cruel,
                              
Meeting Name:City CouncilAgenda status:Final
Meeting date/time:12/4/2019 3:30 PMMinutes status:Draft 
Meeting location:Council Chambers - 3rd Floor
Public Hearings at 3:30 and 5:30 p.m. The HRA will convene during the 5:30 portion of the meeting. The Final Hearing on the proposed 2020 Budget and Tax Levy, aka Truth in Taxation hearing, will be held at or after 6:00 p.m.
Published agenda:Agenda AgendaPublished minutes:Not available 
Meeting video:
Not available
 
Attachments: 
 Add New Comment
File #Date NameDistrictOpinionCommentAction
RES 19-204511/27/2019 1:44 PMSharonScarrellaAnderson Against
Citys Ponzi Taxing Schemes must Seize and Desist Forcing Legislative HEARINGS without Valid Complaints must be Illegal Delegation of Councils Authority,Musical Chairs Justice Delayed is Justice Denied Affiant Sharon Callenging Constitutionality of these Bogus Billings 9 months later is Bizzare or 2006 Theft of Water,Cars,Trailers unabated up to 2019 and 2020 MANDATES Theft by Swindle,Deceptive Trade etc. http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
Refunds mandated 4.5% interest on Fraud is CitysCriminal intent

19 RES
19-2045
Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive Use of Inspection or
Abatement services billed during July 23 to August 21, 2019, and setting
date of Legislative Hearing for January 7, 2020 and City Council public
hearing for February 19, 2020 to consider and levy the assessments
against individual properties. (File No. J2005E, Assessment No. 208304)
Sponsors: Brendmoen
Report of Completion J2005E
Assessment Roll J2005E
Attachments:
20 RES
19-2046
                                             FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT AT THIS TIME;

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon
v. Arch


From: donotreply@sircon.com
Reply-to: no-reply@vertafore.com
To: sharon4anderson@aol.com
Sent: 12/1/2019 5:00:06 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: Your Complaint ID: 60920 has been received

Thank you for using the Minnesota Department of Commerce Online Complaint Portal. This email will acknowledge receipt of your complaint. As part of its review, the Department will contact the other party(ies) in this matter and provide them sufficient time to respond. Please allow at least 60 days to process your complaint.

Once the Department has completed its review of your complaint, it will send you an explanation of its determination.

If you have additional information or documentation, please attach it to your complaint in the Online Complaint Portal under the Actions tab/Documents. If you have further questions, you can attach your questions under the Actions tab/Comments in the Online Complaint Portal.

Both your willingness to bring this matter to our attention and your patience during the investigation is appreciated.

Please do not reply to this auto-generated email.

AllianceMNSharon Anderson

Sharon4Anderson@aol.com

My photo
St.Paul, Minnesota, United States