AFFIDAVITS TO REMOVE ROSENBAUM BAD BEHAVIOR

Subj:

AFFIDAVITS PREJUDICE(MN) JAMES ROSENBAUM_FRANKLIN

_NOELJUDICIARYCONDUCT

Date: 5/6/2006 6:38:09 P.M. Central Daylight Time

From:

Sharon4Anderson

To:

ecfhelpdesk@mnd.uscourts.gov, helpdesk@fedworld.gov, tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us attorney.general@state.mn.us, askdoj@usdoj.gov, james.lackner@usdoj.gov rca@co.ramsey.mn.us, mzack@startribune.com, cdefiebre@startribune.com tnelson@pioneerpress.com, scoop@pioneerpress.com, pgustafson@startribune.com sensenbrenner@mail.house.gov, russell.anderson@courts.state.mn.us fred.grittner@courts.state.mn.us

CC:

Sharon4Anderson,

eagledahn1

Page 1 of 4

Saturday, May 06, 2006 America Online: Sharon4Anderson

United States District Court

District of Minnesota

TOLL-FREE CM/ECF HELP DESK: 866-325-4975 or 612-664

06cv1607

Related Cases 02-0332(Rosenbaum/Noel)

97- 1258(Montgomery)

22 others on file since 1973

COVA: 03-0639(Clark Dryrud)

NOTICE AND MOTIONS TO RECUSE WITH

PREJUDICE. CHIEF JUDGE JAMES ROSENBAUM, FRANKLIN NOEL FOR PATTERNS OF FOR YEARS

BAD BEHAVIOR .

According to Congress, U.S. Supreme Court case law and Minnesota's canons of judicial ethics, a judge must bow out of hearing any case in which his or her impartiality might reasonably be questioned. The Minnesota Canons of Judicial

Conduct say that judges must avoid all impropriety and appearance of impropriety. "The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge's ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired."

Case 0:06-cv-01607-JMR-FLN Document 7 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 1 of

4

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF MINNESOTA

ALL AGENCIES,Counties of Ramsey,Itasca,Aitkin,CrowWing,

City of St. Paul and its City Attorneys, dba Tax Exempt Utilities,District EnergySt. Paul Water Commissioners , www.bull.com data warehousing Medical Records,John Doe Mary

Roe, individually,severally,and in Official Capacities, Complaintants_ Title 31 Relatees

vs

697 Surrey St.- SharonShutOff19Apr06 SharonScarrellaAnderson .

Water CaseNumber:4256

Title 26 501(c)3

MOTION TO RECUSE

Now comes the above named, VA Widow Sharon Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella

Anderson and moves to recuse Judge's James Rosenbaum, Ann Montgomery,Franklin Noel and others as their interests appear, from the above entitled matter

under 2 MS 176.312Aff Pred 8 USCS Sec. 455, and Marshall v

Jerrico Inc., 446 US 238, 242, 100 S.Ct. 1610, 64 L. Ed. 2d 182 (1980).

"The neutrality requirement helps to guarantee that life, liberty, or property will not be taken on the basis of an erroneous or distorted conception of the facts or the law."

Page 2 of 4

The above is applicable to this court by application of Article VI of the United States

Constitution and Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n. 35, 96 S. Ct. 3037, 49 L. Ed. 2d 1067 (1976).

"State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law."

Also see Minnesota Supreme Court , Judicial Canons listed below.

The above mentioned Judge's have in the past deliberately violated our litigant's personal liberties and/or has wantonly refused to provide due process and equal protection to all litigants before the court or has behaved in a manner inconsistent

with that which is needed for full, fair, impartial hearings.

Embellezed Filing Fee's re: US Dist 02-0332, Locked Court Doors, when my husband was at Brainard for 1 year........

Which has led to Murder of Cpl Anderson21Sept00

Murder of Steven M. Quale9Feb05

The United States Constitution guarantees an unbiased Judge who will always provide litigants with full protection of ALL RIGHTS. Therefore, Petitioner:

respectfully demands said judge's recuse themselves in light of the evidence attached as Exhibit 1 detailing prior unethical and/or illegal conduct or conduct which gives

Petitioner good reason to believe the above Judge 's cannot hear the above case "s in a fair and impartial manner$150Rcpt0332(Rosenbaum).jpg (image)

The Court for 30 years In re Scarrella for Associate Justice 221NW2d562,73USPetJudge has DeniedC4-85-1848+PubAccesSC+008.jpg (image)

Employment in their Exclusive Franchise, contrary to Separation of Powers Doctrines.

July 12, 2002

1 In a related advisory opinion, the Committee analyzes recusal issues arising from a judge's representation by the U.S. Department of Justice in legal proceedings. See Advisory Opinion No.

102.

2 The Committee notes that 28 U.S.C. § 455 contains language substantially similar to Canon 3C

(1). However, the charter of the Committee does not permit it to render opinions interpreting

section 455. Judges may want to review the judicial interpretation of section 455 by various

federal circuits in addition to the advice contained in this opinion.

C

Page 3 of 4

Saturday, May 06, 2006 America Online: Sharon4Anderson

Case 0:06-cv-01607-JMR-FLN Document 7 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 3 of 4

Saturday, May 06, 2006 America Online: Sharon4Anderson

Case 0:06-cv-01607-JMR-FLN Document 7 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 2 of 4

lick here: JUDICIARY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES: CODES OF CONDUCT

Further Affiant Sayeth not at this Time:

Its Peculiar that any Judge can make Rulings without the State even having

Salute The Troops& Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855 Motions, Bizzare way to do Justice.USCAVC Docket 03-0639 Sharon L. AndersonSalute The Troops& Cpl. James R. Anderson USMC:11028855

To Shut off our Water , Basic Necessity off Life is the Absolute last

Straw............. "taking" our Homes not once but numerous times for the past 30 years......

VOTE SHARON ANDERSON ATTORNEY GENERAL telfx: 651-776-5835

Sharon4Anderson@aol.comJR&SharonHomeless_17pdfs/files/SharonPeterson

Anderson + Advocates P165913sa1299 PACER

CM/ECF Sharon4Anderson's Legal BlogBriefsAOL Olmstead v. US GovLawbreaker Vision America: US v Cruikshank92US542(1875)Decend to ParticularsJudges As Criminals?

OICE Democracy Files - Sharon Anderson

JUDICIARY POLICIES AND

PROCEDURES: CODES OF

CONDUCT

Introduction

Canon 1. A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence

of the Judiciary

Canon 2. A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance

of Impropriety in All Activities

Canon 3. A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office

Impartially and Diligently

Canon 4. A Judge May Engage in Extra-Judicial Activities To

Improve the Law, the Legal System, and the

Administration of Justice

Canon 5. A Judge Should Regulate Extra-Judicial Activities To

Minimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Duties

Canon 6. A Judge Should Regularly File Reports of Compensation

Received for Law-Related and Extra-Judicial Activities

Canon 7. A Judge Should Refrain from Political Activity

Compliance with the Code of Conduct

Applicable Date of Compliance

Checklists for Financial and Other Conflicts of Interest (PDF)

Page 4 of 4

Saturday, May 06, 2006 America Online: Sharon4Anderson

Case 0:06-cv-01607-JMR-FLN Document 7 Filed 05/08/2006 Page 4 of 4