THE WEIDNER METHODH. Hammond
To everyone who has the courage to go into the courtroom and fight for what is right and good and true and honorable, this book is dedicated.
TABLE OF CONTENTS About this Book About Roger Weidner Techniques and Tactics A Message from the Author Chapter 1 Chapter 9 Chapter 2 Chapter 10 Chapter 3 Chapter 11 Chapter 4 Chapter 12 Chapter 5 Chapter 13 Chapter 6 Chapter 14 Chapter 7 Chapter 15 Chapter 8 Chapter 16"Oh, you're gonna fight 'em, eh Roger?
This oughta be interesting." -- Judge Charles "Chuck" Guinasso
THE WEIDNER METHOD A Summary of Techniques and Tactics
- Request permission to videotape the proceedings.
- Use the Freedom Of Information Act to get your records. Anything with your name or your child's name on it belongs to you.
- Bring crowds into the courtroom, the bigger the better.
- Speak to the crowd in the corridor and focus its attention. This also intimidates the guards. Tell your supporters that, when the judge tries to shut you down, they should all say together: "Let him speak! Let him speak!" Remind everyone to pay attention in the courtroom. When they pay attention, the guards back off. When they become distracted, the guards move in.
- Speak to the guards and police officers standing around. "You guards know what's going on. These judges, attorneys and state agents are kidnapping these children, rigging elections...," or whatever else your case is about.
- Do not rise for the judge if you know he is corrupt. Remain seated when he enters if you want to show that you know he is corrupt.
- Bring binoculars or opera glasses into the courtroom and aim them at the officers of the court for closer scrutiny. It intimidates them.
- Mentally discipline yourself to not think or react emotionally.
- Make the record in the courtroom.
- Stand up together as a group when the guards enter in a threatening manner. If the guards are threatening, get their names.
- Even if you lose, you win, because you are exposing their corruption. Exposure of corruption and the wrath of the public are two things that they fear.
- The worse that it is in the courtroom, the better, because when the story gets into the paper, the people will find out how horrible it was.
- Publish the stories in the newspaper and in any other form of media possible.
- Spread those papers around to every state office, every judge, attorney and government employee and the surrounding community to frighten the public officials and heighten public awareness. Don't forget the police and the courthouse guards.
- Get your tapes of the proceedings from the clerk right away, before you leave the courtroom, so they won't be edited.
- Every time a judge dismisses a case and you appeal it, file compulsory process in the Supreme Court and add his name to your racketeering complaint.
- Issue as many subpoenas as possible, and as often as possible. It makes them nervous.
- Confront and loudly point out the crooks wherever and whenever you see them.
- Do not hire an attorney. Be your own lawyer.
- Realize you may go to jail.
- Don't give up. Be prepared for a long struggle. Once you begin, you must keep up the pressure.
- In brief, file a complaint, put it in the newspaper, go into court and make the record, prepare an affidavit, wait the 30 days, then come into the court and move for Summary Judgment.
- For additional helpful strategies, consult Pamela Gaston's book, Counterfeit Reality, which is available through her Web site (http://www.avoiceforchildren.com).
- Network with others by joining a judicial reform group such as JAIL4Judges (http://www.jail4judges.org), which is dedicated to restoring judicial accountability across the country.
- Inform yourself about the law and your legal options from such groups as the Erwin Rommel School of Law (http://www.members.aol.com/rommellaw), Right Way L.A.W. (http://www.rightwaylaw.org), and the American Pro Se Association (http://www.legalhelp.org). Individual attorneys (http://www.jurisdictionary.com and http://www.citizensjustice.com) and several organizations (http://www.nolo.com, http://www.halt.org/articles/3/33.php, http://www.redressinc.org/ProSeInformation.html, and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Legal_Self_Representation/) have also developed valuable
self-helpWeb sites. ABOUT ROGER WEIDNER
Roger Weidner's overall goal is to restore constitutional government to the people of Oregon.
Roger is a native Oregonian, residing in Portland, Oregon. He is a 1956 graduate of Cleveland High School in Portland. He attended Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah in 1956-57. He joined the army in 1957 and served in the Honor Guard Platoon of the 101st Airborne Division until 1959. At the conclusion of his advanced Airborne infantry training at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, he was designated one of two outstanding trainees in his company of 250 men. Roger returned to Portland, where he graduated in 1963 from Portland State University with a B.S. degree in Business Administration. He went on to Lewis and Clark Law School, graduating with a J.D. law degree in 1968. While attending college, Roger worked as a full-time Portland City fireman.
Roger continued to work as a firefighter until 1973, when he joined the Multnomah County District Attorney's office, where he became the Director of the Consumer Fraud Department in 1975-1976. In 1976, Mr. Weidner went into the private practice of law.
Roger became aware in 1990 of the widespread corruption in the Oregon court system, specifically involving the Donald Kettleberg estate case. Since 1988, Mr. Weidner has been engaged full-time in fighting the corruption and judicial abuse that is having such a devastating impact on so many innocent people across the state of Oregon.
Roger Weidner is single and the father of three grown children: Michael, Paul and Stephanie. He is the son of former Portland deputy Fire Chief Leo Weidner and his wife, Frances. Roger has three brothers: Leo, Bruce and Stephen. He is Vice-President of Oregon Judicial Watch, a state-wide non-partisan citizens' court-watch group, and is Lt. JAILer-In-Chief of the Oregon chapter of JAIL4Judges (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law), a non-partisan group committed to restoring judicial accountability across the country. Roger is also a student of history.
For the past ten years, Roger has been travelling around the state assisting people who have been wrongfully injured by corruption in the Oregon court system. He has developed a broadly-based grassroots support organization.
ABOUT THIS BOOK
This is a book that had to be written. Roger's supporters have implored him for years to write a book, and he was always "too busy." I have written it truly and accurately to the best of my ability. Everything in the book has been freely stated by Roger Weidner many times to many people on many occasions. The numerous people charged in this book with duplicity, treachery, corruption, racketeering, fraud, murder and treason have been so charged on the record in court and do not deny any of the charges.
The Weidner Method is written in first person, Roger Weidner. Roger dictated it in a jumbled sort of way. Words and phrases not dictated verbatim by Roger amount to, cumulatively, less than half a page. The spellings of the many surnames are Roger's spellings. Six years of research and eight months of labor went into the creation of this work. It is extracted and compiled from lengthy interviews with Roger beginning in 1999 and from public records, public knowledge, newspaper articles, eyewitness accounts and personal experience. Roger cooperated with me fully throughout the project and never opposed it in any way. He willingly submitted to interviews again and again and commended me for disrupting my life to get the word out.
I have read the entire manuscript to Roger and he approved it all the way through, telling me repeatedly that it was "tremendous." The corrections he offered were few and minor.
Writing this book was like unraveling a mystery. It was like someone dumping thousands of puzzle pieces on a table and saying, "Put it together." Through my six-and-a-half years of communication with Roger Weidner, including four years of in-person association, I was able to gain a vague grasp of the big picture, enabling me to attempt this book. This is the result of that time and energy. It is entirely at my own expense that it has been conceived, researched and brought to completion.
It is my view that this information is of legitimate public concern. The public has a right to know. Therefore, I am offering The Weidner Method free of charge, and I encourage the copying and dissemination of it.
A MESSAGE FROM THE AUTHOR
It is my hope that Americans in every county in the country will converge upon their courthouses and use The Weidner Method to fight any kind of case.
Throughout my 20 years of research about government corruption, The Weidner Method is the first solution I have ever encountered. If nothing else, it will expose duplicity and make the entire community aware of it, a necessary first step.
Government child-snatching, IRS extortion, voting fraud, government racketeering, health food laws, lawyer malpractice, property taxes, the necessity for citizen oversight of government agencies, unlawfully mandated 501(c)3 non-profit status for churches, lack of protective tariffs, overwhelming imports, mind control, national security abuses, land rights, heavy-handed police, unlawful search and seizure, conflicts of interest, federal funding of abuses, Federal Reserve audit, freedom of worship, poisoning of the air, land and water through chemicals in the water, chemical fertilizers and pesticides and chemtrails, food labeling that is misleading, nutrients that are synthetic, issues concerning hybridized seeds, public schools, taxation, too much government, alloidal ownership of land, improper regulation of industry, unlawful and unconstitutitonal laws and statutes, lawyers holding office, any and all ways in which our constitutional rights are being denied—all these and countless other issues can be addressed in the courtroom using The Weidner Method.
The government should be restructured from the bottom up in cells of 10 families as described in the writings of Kelly Hoskins, author of the Hoskins Report. Senators should again be elected by state legislatures, illegal aliens should be incarcerated, deported and the borders sealed, no more foreign aid, fractional reserve banking should be outlawed, debtfree money should be issued by the Congress, solar technology, which was running factories 100 years ago, should be unsuppressed, natural healing should be unsuppressed, the truth should be unsuppressed, return of the media to the private sector—all of these and countless other issues can be addressed in the courtroom using The Weidner Method.
According to history, when a nation is in transition from one form of government to a different type of government, as we are now (making the transition from freedom to enslavement), there is a point in the struggle, a section of time, during which it could go either way. I believe we are presently teetering on that brink.
I am a Christian first, last and always.
Disclaimer: The statements and opinions expressed in The Weidner Method and by its author are those of Roger Weidner and H. Hammond, respectively, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dr. Bernofsky. The text has been somewhat modified from the original with the knowledge of the author and is presented here in compliance with the intent of the GNU Free Documention license policy of the publisher: Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston MA 02111. The license policy and text of the original work can be accessed at: http://reactor-core.org/security/weidner-method.html. Weidner's name is pronounced Wide´-ner. The Weidner Method is Copyright © 2002 H. Hammond (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Note: Updates about Roger Weidner and the Donald Kettleberg estate case can be found at: http://www.oregonfamilyrights.com/Weidner/index.htm. Weidner can be contacted at (503) 232-6691, or by email at email@example.com. His MySpace blog can be accessed at http://www.myspace.com/rogerweidner. An article about Weidner is available at http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/29-Apr-2006.html.
Help Balance the Scales of Justice!
Web site created November, 1998 This section last modified June, 2008
Home Page Site Map About Bernofsky Curriculum Vitae Lawsuits Case Calendar Judicial Misconduct Judicial Reform Contact Interviews Disclaimer
This Web site is not associated with Tulane University or its affiliates
© 1998-2008 Carl Bernofsky - All rights reserved
1 message - Collapse all - Translate all to Translated (View all originals) -Reporting discussionMessages reported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.Your reply message has not been sent.Your post was successful
View profile More options Oct 11, 3:20 pm
I have appended below Chapter 13 of ex-Oregon-prosecutor and court activist
Roger Weidner's "Method." I particularly like this chapter because he tells
you PRECISELY the purpose of court within the context of justly ruling
between adversaries. He also gives a little financial history.
I have also appended the Weidner Method summary below. Yes, I know I could
just send you to the web page, but it might disappear and I wanted to "make
record" in the Lawmen archives.
Get the whole book here: http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm
When Attorneys Fight Judicial Corruption
Roger Weidner is a former attorney and public prosecutor who battled
pervasive corruption in the Oregon court system for 12 years as he struggled
to return the now-valued $100 million Kettleberg estate to its rightful
beneficiary after it had been wrongly seized by an unscrupulous but
well-connected attorney. For his efforts, Weidner was repeatedly arrested,
imprisoned, confined to an insane asylum, and finally disbarred. His story,
as told to H. Hammond, testifies to how the judiciary has usurped the law
for its own purposes and replaced constitutional guarantees with a system in
which judges rule by decree. It exemplifies the failure of meaningful
accountability within the judicial branch.
THE WEIDNER METHOD
To everyone who has the courage to go into the courtroom and fight for what
is right and good and true and honorable, this book is dedicated.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
About this Book <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Book>
About Roger <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Weidner>
Techniques <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Method> and
A Message <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Author> from
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 10> 10
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 11> 11
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 12> 12
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 13> 13
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 14> 14
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 15> 15
Chapter <http://www.tulanelink.com/stories/weidner_02a.htm#Chapter 16> 16
"Oh, you're gonna fight 'em, eh Roger?
This oughta be interesting." -- Judge Charles "Chuck" Guinasso
Remember, all that a courtroom is, it's a place to make a public record.
When you come in and you're sworn in as a witness, you take an oath to tell
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. If you lie that's
perjury and punishable by a prison sentence. It's a class C felony. What
I've come to find out is that in our system this is the time spoken of in
the Bible where right is wrong and wrong is right. You come into the
courtroom and you raise your hand and take an oath to tell the truth. But if
you actually try to tell the truth you are arrested and jailed and
ultimately thrown in the insane asylum, as I was, subjected to incredible
abuse, as I was, to discredit you personally, but not to challenge you
legally, which is what they should do. Not a word I've said over the last 12
years about this corruption has anyone challenged. But the method that we've
set up is to file a complaint-that gives you standing-and come into the
courtroom with this large body of people. Once you file a complaint you are
a party. A party always has a right to speak. If you hire an attorney the
judge will say you can't speak, only your attorney can speak. This is the
reason we tell people not to hire attorneys. You cannot do that if you want
to prevail. The attorney is a part of the system and he will gag you so that
the full story does not come out. And if the full story does not come out
you don't have a complete case made in that courtroom. You come into that
courtroom, having filed your complaint pro se, you make your record of all
these criminal charges then put that story in the paper and spread it as
widely as you can to expose them. We've been doing this over and over again
for the last 10 years.
When you file that complaint in an adversary system, you are making a charge
against someone. You ran into me. You injured me. You said something that
was false about me. You libeled me. You engaged in unfair competition in
which the statute says you cannot engage. You came up and you punched me in
the nose. The common law includes what they call a Cause of Action. You have
a right to be compensated by someone who injures you. If they do it
negligently you're entitled to compensation. If they do it intentionally
you're entitled to punitive damages. The Cause of Action gives a person the
right to sue, to seek recovery for the injury he's suffered. The injury
gives rise to the Cause of Action.
Now, if you have a Cause of Action against someone, there are certain facts
that you have to prove supporting that Cause of Action. You say one set of
facts are so and the other side says a separate set. What's happened in our
system is they've put in all these rules, the Uniform Trial Court Rules, and
all these different restrictions and statutes of limitation that cut off and
limit your rights. If you don't bring that action within 2 years you can't
bring it because of the Statute of Limitations. When the injury is inflicted
you have then this Cause of Action and you say one set of facts are so and
the other side disputes it. We have an adversary system. You call your
witnesses to put on your case and the other side has the right to
cross-examine your witnesses to show that what they're saying is false. And
the judge's function is simply that of a referee. If I'm the witness I'm
"...and Harry told me that John was a jerk and he did all this before."